From f0213305a7740b63a41120da14aff3c54b8e3ea8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Broytman Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 18:47:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Minor grammar fixes --- pep-git.txt | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/pep-git.txt b/pep-git.txt index 970f4a2..6588eda 100644 --- a/pep-git.txt +++ b/pep-git.txt @@ -392,9 +392,9 @@ Read `how to recover from upstream rebase It is in ``git help rebase``. On the other hand don't be too afraid about commit editing. You can -safely edit, remove, reorder, combine and split commits that hasn't +safely edit, remove, reorder, combine and split commits that haven't been pushed yet. You can even push commits to your own (backup) repo, -edit them later and force-push edited commits to replace what has +edit them later and force-push edited commits to replace what have already been pushed. Not a problem until commits are in a public or shared repository. @@ -489,10 +489,11 @@ git revert: revert a commit --------------------------- ``git revert`` reverts a commit or commits, that is, it creates a new -commit or commits that reverts the effects of the given commits. It's -the only way to undo published commits (``git commit --amend``, ``git -rebase`` and ``git reset`` change the branch in non-fast-forwardable -ways so they should only be used for non-pushed commits.) +commit or commits that revert(s) the effects of the given commits. +It's the only way to undo published commits (``git commit --amend``, +``git rebase`` and ``git reset`` change the branch in +non-fast-forwardable ways so they should only be used for non-pushed +commits.) There is a problem with reverting a merge commit. ``git revert`` can undo the code created by the merge commit but it cannot undo the fact -- 2.39.2