<arg choice="opt">
<option>-cCDP</option>
</arg>
+ <arg choice="opt">
+ <option>-f charset</option>
+ </arg>
<arg choice="opt">
<option>-H|--host=hostname</option>
</arg>
<arg choice="opt">
- <option>-f charset</option>
+ <option>-d header1[,header2,header3...]</option>
+ </arg>
+ <arg choice="opt">
+ <option>-d *[,-header1,-header2,-header3...]</option>
</arg>
<arg choice="opt">
- <option>-d header</option>
+ <option>-p header1[,header2,header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</option>
</arg>
<arg choice="opt">
- <option>-p header:param</option>
+ <option>-p *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</option>
+ <option>-p header1[,header2,header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</option>
+ <option>-p *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</option>
+ </arg>
+ <arg choice="opt">
+ <option>-r header1[,header2,header3...]</option>
+ </arg>
+ <arg choice="opt">
+ <option>-r *[,-header1,-header2,-header3...]</option>
+ </arg>
+ <arg choice="opt">
+ <option>-R header1[,header2,header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</option>
+ <option>-R *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</option>
+ <option>-R header1[,header2,header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</option>
+ <option>-R *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</option>
</arg>
<arg choice="opt">
<option>-beit mask</option>
<title>DESCRIPTION</title>
<para>
Mail users, especially in non-English countries, often find that mail
-messages arrived in different formats, with different content types, in
-different encodings and charsets. Usually it is good because it allows to use
-an appropriate format/encoding/whatever. Sometimes, though, some unification is
-desirable. For example, one may want to put mail messages into an archive,
-make HTML indices, run search indexer, etc. In such situations converting
-messages to text in one character set and skipping some binary attachments is
-much desirable.
+ messages arrived in different formats, with different content types, in
+ different encodings and charsets. Usually it is good because it allows to
+ use an appropriate format/encoding/whatever. Sometimes, though, some
+ unification is desirable. For example, one may want to put mail messages
+ into an archive, make HTML indices, run search indexer, etc. In such
+ situations converting messages to text in one character set and skipping
+ some binary attachments is much desirable.
</para>
<para>
<para>
This is a program to decode MIME messages. The program expects one input
-file (either on command line or on stdin) which is treated as an RFC822
-message, and decodes to stdout or an output file. If the file is not an RFC822
-message it is just copied to the output one-to-one. If the file is a simple
-RFC822 message it is decoded as one part. If it is a MIME message with multiple
-parts ("attachments") all parts are decoded. Decoding can be controlled by
-command-line options.
+ file (either on command line or on stdin) which is treated as an RFC822
+ message, and decodes to stdout or an output file. If the file is not an
+ RFC822 message it is just copied to the output one-to-one. If the file is a
+ simple RFC822 message it is decoded as one part. If it is a MIME message
+ with multiple parts ("attachments") all parts are decoded. Decoding can be
+ controlled by command-line options.
</para>
<para>
- First, Subject and Content-Disposition headers are examined. If any of those
- exists, it is decoded according to RFC2047. Content-Disposition header is
- not decoded - only its "filename" parameter. Encoded header parameters
- violate the RFC, but widely deployed anyway by ignorant coders who never
- even heard about RFCs. Correct parameter encoding specified by RFC2231. This
- program decodes RFC2231-encoded parameters, too.
+ First, for every part the program removes headers and parameters listed with
+ -r and -R options. Then, Subject and Content-Disposition headers (and all
+ headers listed with -d and -p options) are examined. If any of those exists,
+ they are decoded according to RFC2047. Content-Disposition header is not
+ decoded - only its "filename" parameter. Encoded header parameters violate
+ the RFC, but widely deployed anyway by ignorant coders who never even heard
+ about RFCs. Correct parameter encoding specified by RFC2231. This program
+ decodes RFC2231-encoded parameters, too.
</para>
<para>
than POSIX, please don't ask me; real OS users can consult my example at
<ulink url="http://phdru.name/Software/dotfiles/mailcap.html">http://phdru.name/Software/dotfiles/mailcap.html</ulink>).
The decoding process uses the first copiousoutput filter it can find. If
- there is no any filter the body just passed as is.
+ there are no filters the body just passed as is.
</para>
<para>
Then Content-Type header is consulted for charset. If it is not equal to the
- current locale charset the body text is recoded. Finally message headers and
- the body are flushed to stdout.
+ current locale charset and recoding is allowed the body text is recoded.
+ Finally message headers and the body are flushed to stdout.
</para>
</refsect1>
+<refsect1>
+ <para>
+ Please be warned that in the following options asterisk is a shell
+ metacharacter and should be escaped or quoted. Either write -d \*,-h1,-h2
+ or -d '*,-h1,-h2' or such.
+ </para>
+</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>OPTIONS</title>
<term>-c</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Recode different character sets in message body to current default
- charset; this is the default.
+ Recode different character sets in message bodies to the current
+ default charset; this is the default.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<term>-C</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Do not recode character sets in message body.
+ Do not recode character sets in message bodies.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-f charset</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Force this charset to be the current default charset instead of
+ the current locale.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
- <term>-f charset</term>
+ <term>-d header1[,header2,header3...]</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Force this charset to be the current default charset instead of
- the current locale.
+ Add the header(s) to a list of headers to decode; initially the
+ list contains headers "From", "To", "Cc", "Reply-To",
+ "Mail-Followup-To" and "Subject".
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
- <term>-d header</term>
+ <term>-d *[,-header1,-header2,-header3...]</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Add the header to a list of headers to decode; initially the list
- contains headers "From" and "Subject".
+ This variant completely changes headers decoding. First, the list of
+ headers to decode is cleared. Then all the headers are decoded
+ except the given list of exceptions (headers listed with '-'). In
+ this mode it would be meaningless to give more than one -d options
+ but the program doesn't enforce it.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
- <term>-p header:param</term>
+ <term>-p header1[,header2,header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Add the parameters(s) to a list of headers parameters to decode;
+ the parameters will be decoded only for the given header(s).
+ Initially the list contains header "Content-Type", parameter "name";
+ and header "Content-Disposition", parameter "filename".
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-p *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Add the parameters(s) to a list of headers parameters to decode;
+ the parameters will be decoded for all headers except the given
+ ones.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-p header1[,header2,header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Add the (header, param) pair to a list of headers' parameters to
- decode; initially the list contains header "Content-Disposition",
- parameter "filename".
+ Decode all parameters except listed for the given list of headers.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-p *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Decode all parameters except listed for all headers (except listed).
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<term>-P</term>
<listitem>
<para>
- Clear the list of headers' parameters to decode (make it empty).
+ Clear the list of headers parameters to decode (make it empty).
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-r header1[,header2,header3...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Add the header(s) to a list of headers to remove completely;
+ initially the list is empty.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-r *[,-header1,-header2,-header3...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Remove all headers except listed.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-R header1[,header2,header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Add the parameters(s) to a list of headers parameters to remove;
+ the parameters will be decoded only for the given header(s).
+ Initially the list is empty.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-R *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:param1[,param2,param3,...]</term>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-R header1[,header2,header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</term>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>-R *[,-header1,-header2,-header3,...]:*[,-param1,-param2,-param3,...]</term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Remove listed parameters (or all parameters except listed) frome
+ these headers (or from all headers except listed).
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<para>
- The 4 list options (-beit) require more explanation. They allow a user
-to control body decoding with great flexibility. Think about said mail
-archive; for example, its maintainer wants to put there only texts, convert
-Postscript/PDF to text, pass HTML and images as is, and ignore everything
-else. Easy:
+ The 4 list options (-beit) require more explanation. They allow a user to
+ control body decoding with great flexibility. Think about said mail archive;
+ for example, its maintainer wants to put there only texts, convert
+ Postscript/PDF to text, pass HTML and images as is, and ignore everything
+ else. Easy:
</para>
<para>
<title>BUGS</title>
<para>
The program may produce incorrect MIME message. The purpose of the program
-is to decode whatever it is possible to decode, not to produce absolutely
-correct MIME output. The incorrect parts are obvious - decoded Subject headers
-and filenames. Other than that output is correct MIME message. The program does
-not try to guess whether the headers are correct. For example, if a message
-header states that charset is iso8859-5, but the body is actually in utf-8
-the program will recode the message with the wrong charset.
+ is to decode whatever it is possible to decode, not to produce absolutely
+ correct MIME output. The incorrect parts are obvious - decoded
+ From/To/Cc/Reply-To/Mail-Followup-To/Subject headers and filenames. Other
+ than that output is correct MIME message. The program does not try to guess
+ whether the headers are correct. For example, if a message header states
+ that charset is iso8859-5, but the body is actually in utf-8 the program
+ will recode the message with the wrong charset.
</para>
</refsect1>